Comparison
Free spreadsheet vs purpose-built PE platform
Google Sheets is the default fitness-testing tool for most PE departments — a free, familiar spreadsheet where teachers manually type scores, write VLOOKUP formulas for ratings, and wrestle with per-class tabs. It works, but it breaks down once you have more than a handful of classes or more than one teacher capturing on the same day.
| Feature | Fitness Tests | Google Sheets | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | $99-$299/yr school plans, free for individuals | Free | Theirs |
| Setup time for a new testing day | Seconds (teams persist, templates pre-built) | 30-60 min (copy template, update formulas, share) | FT |
| Automatic age/gender-specific ratings | Built in, no configuration | Requires manual VLOOKUP tables | FT |
| Multiple teachers capturing at once | Native real-time sync, no conflicts | Possible but prone to accidental overwrites | FT |
| Mobile test capture | Native iOS + Android apps, offline support | Sheets mobile works but is slow for rapid score entry | FT |
| Student-facing PDF reports | One-click branded PDFs | Manual — build a template, copy each student's data | FT |
| Data ownership / export | CSV / PDF export; your data any time | Fully owned by you in Sheets | Tie |
| Works with no internet | Yes (iOS/Android apps) — syncs when back online | Sheets offline mode works with setup | Tie |
| Custom tests | Add on Growth plan and above | Infinite (it's just a spreadsheet) | Theirs |
Sheets is the right call if you're a single teacher testing one class once a year and don't mind the setup. FitnessTests pays for itself the first time you run tests across multiple classes in a week, or the first time you want to hand a student a branded PDF of their results without rebuilding a template from scratch.
This comparison reflects a best-effort, publicly-documented view of Google Sheets as of writing. For their latest features and pricing visit sheets.google.com.